Résumé

This paper presents a new evolutionary method and tool called BMLDS (Bi-level Multi-Label Detection of Smells) that optimizes a population of classifier chains for the multi-label detection of smells. As the chain is sensitive to the labels' (i.e., smell types) order, the chains induction task is framed as a bi-level optimization problem, where the upper-level role is to search for the optimal order of each considered chain while the lower-level one is to generate the chains. This allows taking into consideration the interactions between smells in the multi-label detection process. The statistical analysis of the experimental results reveals the merits of our proposal with respect to several existing works.

Résumé

Code smells, also known as anti-patterns, are poor design or implementation choices that hinder program comprehensibility and maintainability. While several code smell detection methods have been proposed, Mantyla et al. identified the uncertainty issue as one of the major individual human factors that may affect developer’s decisions about the smelliness of software classes: they may indeed have different opinions mainly due to their different knowledge and expertise. Unfortunately, almost all the existing approaches assume data perfection and neglect the uncertainty when identifying the labels of the software classes. Ignoring or rejecting any uncertainty form could lead to a considerable loss of information, which could significantly deteriorate the effectiveness of the detection and identification processes. Inspired by our previous works and motivated by the interesting performance of the PDT (Possibilistic Decision Tree) in classifying uncertain data, we propose ADIPE (Anti-pattern Detection and Identification using Possibilistic decision tree Evolution), as a new tool that evolves and optimizes a set of detectors (PDTs) that could effectively deal with software class labels uncertainty using some concepts from the Possibility theory. ADIPE uses a PBE (Possibilistic Base of Examples: a dataset with possibilistic labels) that it is built using a set of opinion-based classifiers (i.e., a set of probabilistic classifiers) with the aim to simulate human developers’ uncertainty. A set of advisors and probabilistic classifiers are employed in order to mimic the subjectivity and the doubtfulness of software engineers. A detailed experimental study is conducted to show the merits and outperformance of ADIPE in dealing with uncertainty in code smells detection and identification with respect to four relevant state-of-the-art methods, including the baseline PDT. The experimental study was performed in uncertain and certain environments based on two suitable metrics: PF-measure_dist (Possibilistic F-measure_Distance) and IAC (Information Affinity Criterion); which corresponds to the F-measure and Accuracy (PCC) for the certain case. The obtained results for the uncertain environment reveal that for the detection process, the PF-measure_dist of ADIPE ranges within [0.9047 and 0.9285], and its IAC lies within [0.9288 and 0.9557]; while for the identification process, the PF-measure_dist of ADIPE is in [0.8545, 0.9228], and its IAC lies within [0.8751, 0.933]. ADIPE is able to find 35% more code smells with uncertain data than the second best algorithm (i.e., BLOP). In addition, ADIPE succeeds to decrease the number of false alarms (i.e., misclassified smelly instances) with a rate equals to 12%. Our proposed approach is also able to identify 43% more smell types than BLOP and decreases the number of false alarms with a rate equals to 32%. Similar results were obtained for the certain environment, which demonstrate the ability of ADIPE to also deal with the certain environment.

Résumé

Résumé

Code smells (a.k.a. anti-patterns) are manifestations of poor design solutions that could deteriorate the software maintainability and evolution. Despite the high number of existing detection methods, the issue of class label uncertainty is usually omitted. Indeed, two human experts may have different degrees of uncertainty about the smelliness of a particular software class not only for the smell detection task but also for the smell type identification one. Thus, this uncertainty should be taken into account and then processed by detection tools. Unfortunately, these latter usually reject and/or ignore uncertain data that correspond to software classes (i.e. dataset instances) with uncertain labels. This practice could considerably degrade the detection/identification process effectiveness. Motivated by this observation and the interesting performance of the Possibilistic K-NN (PK-NN) classifier in dealing with uncertain data, we propose a new possibilistic evolutionary detection method, named ADIPOK (Anti-patterns Detection and Identification using Possibilistic Optimized K-NNs), that is able to deal with label uncertainty using some concepts stemming from the Possibility theory. ADIPOK is validated using a possibilistic base of smell examples that simulates the subjectivity of software engineers’ opinions’ uncertainty. The statistical analysis of the obtained results on a set of comparative experiments with respect to four state-of-the-art methods show the merits of our proposed method.

Résumé

Like the case of any software, Web Services (WSs) developers could introduce anti-patterns due to the lack of experience and badly-planned changes. During the last decade, search-based approaches have shown their outperformance over other approaches mainly thanks to their global search ability. Unfortunately, these approaches do not consider the uncertainty of class labels. In fact, two experts could be uncertain about the smelliness of a particular WS interface but also about the smell type. Currently, existing works reject uncertain data that correspond to WSs interfaces with doubtful labels. Motivated by this observation and the good performance of the possibilistic K-NN classifier in handling uncertain data, we propose a new evolutionary detection approach, named Web Services Anti-patterns Detection and Identification using Possibilistic Optimized K-NNs (WS-ADIPOK), which can cope with the uncertainty based on the Possibility Theory. The obtained experimental results reveal the merits of our proposal regarding four relevant state-of-the-art approaches.

Résumé

Résumé

Résumé

Code smells, also known as anti-patterns, are indicators of bad design solutions. However, two different experts may have different opinions not only about the smelliness of a particular software class but also about the smell type. This causes an uncertainty problem that should be taken into account. Unfortunately, existing works reject uncertain data that correspond to software classes with doubtful labels. Uncertain data rejection could cause a significant loss of information that could considerably degrade the performance of the detection process. Motivated by this observation and the good performance of the possibilistic K-NN classifier in handling uncertain data, we propose in this paper a new evolutionary detection method, named ADIPOK (Anti-pattern Detection and Identification using Possibilistic Optimized K-NN), that is able to cope with the uncertainty factor using the possibility theory. The comparative experimental results reveal the merits of our proposal with respect to four relevant state-of-the-art approaches.