Informations générales

Maître Assistant
Biography
Samira Harrabi was born on June 9, 1983, in Tunisia. She pursued her undergraduate studies at Bouhajla College in Bouhajla, Kairouan (South of Tunisia), where she obtained her Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics with Honors in 2003.
After completing her undergraduate degree, she moved to Monastir to continue her higher education in computer engineering. In 2011, she received her Master’s degree in Computer Engineering.
Since September 2011, she has been working in academia, first as a Contractual Assistant and currently as a Maître Assistante (Assistant Professor).
In 2012, she began her doctoral studies in computer science. Her Ph.D. research focuses on routing in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) based on agent technology. Over the years, her research interests have evolved to encompass the Internet of Vehicles (IoV), intelligent transportation systems, distributed computing, and network optimization.
More recently, she has also been investigating the role of IoV in sustainable development, with particular attention to eco-friendly communication protocols, energy-efficient routing, and smart mobility solutions.
In addition to her research activities, Samira has been actively involved in teaching undergraduate and graduate courses, supervising student projects, and contributing to academic events and conferences. Her broader academic interests include network protocols, multi-agent systems, artificial intelligence, vehicular communications, and sustainable technologies.
Axes de recherche
Publications
-
2024Samira Harrabi, Ines Ben Jaafar, Oumaima Omrani
A vehicle-to-infrastructure communication privacy protocolused Blockchain
LicenseCC BY 4.0, 2024
Résumé
Since several decade, the Internet of Things IoT hasattracted enormous interest in the research communityand industry. However, IoT technologies has completelytransformed vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) intothe "Internet of Vehicles" IoV. In IoV networks, we needto integrate many different technologies, services andstandards. However, the heterogeneity and large numberof vehicles will increase the need of data security.The IoV security issues are critical because of the vulnerabilitiesthat exist during the transmission of informationthat expose the IoV to attacks. Each attack hasa security procedure. Many protocols and mechanismsexist to combat or avoid this communication securityproblem. One of these protocols is VIPER (a Vehicleto-Infrastructure communication Privacy EnforcementpRotocol). In our work, we try to improve this protocolby using Blockchain technology and certificationauthority.
-
2023Samira Harrabi, Ines Ben Jaafar, Khaled Ghedira
Survey on IoV Routing Protocols
Wireless Personal Communications 128(1), 2023
Résumé
Internet of vehicles (IoV) can be considered as a superset of vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs). It extends VANET’s structure, applications and scale. Unlike, the traditional intelligent transportation system (ITS), IoV focus more on information interactions between vehicles, roadside units (RSU) and humans. The principal aim is to make people obtain road traffic information easily and in real-time, to ensure the travel convenience, and to increase the travel comfort. The goal behind the Internet of vehicles is essentially to be used in urban traffic environment to ensure network access for passengers and drivers. The environment of the IoV is the combination of different wireless network environment as well as road conditions. Despite its continuing expansion, the IOV contains different radio access technologies that lead to a heterogeneous network, and make it more crucial than the VANET. These drawbacks pose numerous challenges, especially the routing one. In IoV environment, the routing protocol must cope with events such as link failure and to find the best route to propagate the data toward the desired destination. In this paper, we mainly focus on surveying the IoV routing protocols, hence we present and compare unicast, multicast and broadcast protocols.
-
2021Khaled Ghedira, Ines Ben Jaafar, Samira Harrabi
DARSV: a dynamic agent routing simulator for VANETs
International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 2021
Résumé
In this paper, a novel dynamic agent routing simulator for vehicular ad-hoc networks (DARSV) is presented. The main purpose of DARSV simulator is to realise a successful large-scale simulation of agent based routing approach in vehicular networks. To conduct this goal, the proposed simulator combines the Java Agent DEvelopment (JADE) which is a powerful multi-agent system (MAS) framework with the dynamic ad hoc routing simulator (DARS) that takes into account the dynamic nature of environment networks. The simulation results are discussed to evaluate the efficiency and the performance of the proposed simulator.
Ines Ben Jaafar, Samira Harrabi, Khaled GhediraPerformance Analysis of Vanets Routing Protocols
LicenseCC BY 4.0, 2021
Résumé
Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) are a particular class of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs). The VANETs provide wireless communication among vehicles and vehicle-to-road-side units. Even though the VANETs are a specific type of MANETs, a highly dynamic topology is a main feature that differentiates them from other kinds of ad hoc networks. As a result, designing an efficient routing protocol is considered a challenge. The performance of vehicle-to-vehicle communication depends on how better the routing protocol takes in consideration the particularities of the VANETs. Swarm Intelligence (SI) is considered as a promising solution to optimize vehicular communication costs. In this paper, we explore the SI approach to deal with the routing problems in the VANETs. We also evaluate and compare two swarming agent-based protocols using numerous QoS parameters, namely the average end-to-end delay and the ratio packet loss which influence the performance of network communication.
-
2018Samira Harrabi, Ines Ben Jaafar, Khaled ghedira
A Swarm Intelligence-based Routing Protocol for Vehicular Networks
International Journal of Vehicle Information and Communication Systems (IJVICS), 2018
Résumé
Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs) are a particular case of Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs). They are applied to exchange information among vehicles and between vehicles and a nearby fixed infrastructure. Unlike the MANETs, the VANETs have highly mobile nodes that cause a dynamic topology, a disconnected network, etc. Consequently, these features pose numerous challenges. One of them is routing. In a vehicular environment, the routing protocol needs to cope with events like link failure and to find an effective path to propagate the information toward the desired destination. In this context, we assume in this paper that the vehicles are intelligent and have a knowledge base about their communication environment. Our aim is to carry out the routing of the data based on swarm intelligence. The optimum route is explored using the Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO). The proposed approach is called the Optimised Agent-based AODV Protocol for VANET (OptA2PV).
-
2017Samira Harrabi, Ines Ben Jaafar, khaled ghedira
Message Dissemination in Vehicular Networks on the Basis of Agent Technology
An International Journal of Wireless Personal Communications, 2017
Résumé
Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) is a sub-family of Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET). The principal goal of VANET is to provide communications between nearby nodes or between nodes and fixed infrastructure. Despite that VANET is considered as a subclass of MANET, it has for particularity the high mobility of vehicles producing the frequent changes of network topology that involve changing of road and varying node density of vehicles existing in this road. That‘s why, the most proposed clustering algorithms for MANET are unsuitable for VANET. Various searches have been recently published deal with clustering for VANETs, but most of them are focused on minimizing network overhead value, number of created clusters and had not considered the vehicles interests which defined as any related data used to differentiate vehicle from another. In this paper, we propose a novel clustering algorithm based on agent technology to improve routing in VANET.
Samira Harrabi, Ines Ben Jaafar, Khaled GhediraReliability and Quality of Service of an Optimized Protocol for Routing in VANETs
In CTRQ 2017: The tenth international conference on communication theory, reliability, and quality of service., 2017
Résumé
Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANETs) are a special kind of Mobile Ad hoc NETworks (MANETs), which can provide scalable solutions for applications such as traffic safety, internet access, etc. To properly achieve this goal, these applications need an efficient routing protocol. Yet, contrary to the routing protocols designed for the MANETs, the routing protocols for the VANETs must take into account the highly dynamic topology caused by the fast mobility of the vehicles. Hence, improving the MANET routing protocol or designing a new one specific for the VANETs are the usual approaches to efficiently perform the routing protocol in a vehicular environment. In this context, we previously enhanced the Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing protocol (DSDV) based on the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and the Multi-Agent System (MAS). This motivation for the PSO and MAS comes from the behaviors seen in very complicated problems, in particular routing. The main goal of this paper is to carry out a performance evaluation of the enhanced version in comparison to a well-known routing protocol which is the Intelligent Based Clustering Algorithm in VANET (IBCAV). The simulation results show that integrating both the MAS and the PSO is able to guarantee a certain level of quality of service in terms of loss packet, throughput and overhead.
-
2016Samira Harrabi, Ines ben Jaafar, Khaled ghedira
Routing Challenges and Solutions in Vehicular Ad hoc Networks
Sensors and Transducer journal, 2016
Résumé
Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) are known as a special type of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) specialized in vehicular communications. These networks are based on smart vehicles and basestations, which share data by means of wireless communications. To route these information, a routing protocol is required. Since the VANETs have a particular network features as rapidly changeable topology, designing an efficient routing scheme is a very hard task. In this paper, we mainly focus on surveying new routing protocols dedicated to VANETs. We present unicast, multicast and broadcast protocols. The experimental results are discussed to evaluate the performance of the presented methods.
Samira Harrabi, Ines Ben Jaafar, Khaled GhediraVANETs Networking Protocols : An Analytical study
The Tenth International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications ( SENSORCOMM 2016), 2016
Résumé
Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANETs) are considered as a class of Mobile Ad hoc NETworks (MANETs). The VANETs are a set of vehicles that are capable of exchanging data dynamically and without needing any pre-existing and fixed network infrastructure. Each node sends and receives messages in its communication area. Thus, message routing is done through a routing protocol. Despite the fact that the VANETs are a subgroup of the MANETs, they possess exceptional network behaviors like high mobility and dynamic topology, which make the MANETs routing protocols unsuitable for the VANETs. This paper summarizes the different protocols used for routing in the VANETs that focuses on a vehicle-to-vehicle communication. Utilizing an OMNET++ simulator, the experimental results are discussed to compare the presented routing protocol categories.
Samira Harrabi, Ines ben jaafar, Khaled ghediraNovel Optimized Routing Scheme for VANETs »
The 7th International Conference on Emerging Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks (Elsevier, EUSPN-2016), 2016
Résumé
The Vehicular ad -hoc networks (VANETs) are a specific type of Mobile ad-hoc networks (MANETs). However, the main problem related to it is the potential high speed of moving vehicles. This special property causes frequent changing in network topology and instability of communication routes. Consequently, some of the challenges that researchers focus on are routing protocols for VANETs. They have proved that the existing MANET proactive routing protocols are the most used for vehicular communication. Yet, they are not as adequate as they are for VANETs. The main problem with these protocols in dynamic environment is their route instability. This paper combines multi-agent system approach and PSO algorithm to solve the above mentioned problems. We carried out a set of simulations tests to evaluate the performance of our scheme. The simulation part shows promising results regarding the adoption of the proposed scheme.
Samira Harrabi, nes Ben jaafar, Khaled GhediraAn Enhanced AODV Routing Protocol for Vehicular Adhoc Networks
International conference on Big Data and Advanced Wireless technologies (ACM,BDAW 2016) ,, 2016
Résumé
The key difference of Vehicular Ad- hoc Network (VANET) and Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is the exceptional mobility pattern and quick variability variable of network topology. The existing MANET routing protocols are inadequate for the VANET. One good manner of data sending in vehicular environment is to enhance the MANET routing protocols and make them appropriate for the VANET. Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) is one of the most important MANET reactive protocols. Nevertheless, once we have to deal with a VANET, its performance is poor. In this paper, we propose an enhancing the AODV routing protocol based on agent technology to improve the Quality of Service (QoS) in VANET. The experimental results show that our approach outperforms the AODV protocol in terms of routing overhead, dropped packets rate and transfer packets delay.
-
2014Samira Harrabi, Walid Chainbi, Khaled Ghedira
A multi-agent proactive routing protocol for Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks
Proc.of The 2014 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (IEEE ISNCC 2014),, 2014
Résumé
Vehicular ad hoc network is one of the most promising applications of MANET. However, they have special properties such as high mobility, network portioning and constrained topology which require smaller latency and higher reliability. These vehicles that move along the same road are able to communicate either directly to the destination or by using the intermediate node, such as router. Therefore, designing an efficient routing protocol for all VANETs scenarios is very hard. A lot of researches about routing in VANETs are considering DSDV routing protocol as the most suitable protocol for mobility environment. But DSDV generates a large volume of control packets and takes up a large part of available bandwidth. In this paper, we propose an improving DSDV routing protocol based on multi-agent system approach to solve the performance problems mentioned above. Experimental results show promising results regarding the adoption of the proposed approach.
118 -
2013Samira Harrabi, Walid Chainbi, Khaled Ghedira
A Multi-agent Approach for Routing on Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks,
The 4th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies, 2013
Résumé
Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network is a special form of mobile ad -hoc networks (MANETs) which is a vehicle to vehicle and vehicle roadside wireless communication network. VANET is a new standard that integrates Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and other mobile connectivity protocols. The essential requirement of VANET is that it should be able to communicate in any environment irrespective of traffic densities and vehicle locations. Vehicular communications are made in fluctuating environment and should work both in urban and rural areas. Considering the large number of nodes participating in these networks and their high mobility, debates still exist about the feasibility of routing protocols. Analyzes of traditional routing protocols for MANETs demonstrated that their performance is poor in VANETs. The main problem with these protocols in VANETs environments is their route instability. Consequently, many packets are dropped and the overhead due to route repairs or failure notifications increases significantly, leading to low delivery ratios and high transmission delays. This paper introduces a multi-agent system approach to solve the problems mentioned above and improve Vehicular ad-hoc network routing.
BibTeX
1. Goonewardene,R.T.,Ali,F.H.,&Stipidis,E.(2009).Robustmobilityadaptiveclusteringschemewith
Support forgeographicroutingforvehicularadhocnetworks. IET IntelligentTransportationSystems,
3(2), 148–158.2. Mottahedi,M.,Jabbehdari,S.,&Adabi,S.(2013).IBCAV:Intelligentbasedclusteringalgorithmin
VANET. IJCSI InternationalJournalofComputerScienceIssues,10(1), 538–543.
3. Mohamed,S.A.E.,Nasr,A.,&Ansari,G.A.(2012).Precisepositioningsystemsforvehicularad-hoc
networks’. InternationalJournalofWireless&MobileNetworks(IJWMN), 4(2), 251–265.
4. Jennings,N.R.,Sycara,K.,&Wooldridge,M.(1998).Aroadmapofagentresearchanddevelopment.
Autonomous AgentsandMulti-AgentSystems,1, 275–306.
5. Azzouzi,S.,Benattou,M.,ElHassanCharaf,M.,&Abouchabaka,J.(2010).SMAandmobileagents
actors fordistributedtesting. IJCSI InternationalJournalofComputerScienceIssues,7(5), 231–238.
6. Mustafa,B.,&Raja,U.W.(2010). IssuesofroutinginVANET. UniversityessayfromBlekingeTeknis-
kaHo¨gskola/COM. http://denver.bth.se/fou/cuppsats.nsf/all/b1da115d9e5e4a47c1257758005230c7/
$file/IssuesofroutinginVANETmasterthesis.pdf.
7. Ranjan,P.,&Ahirwar,K.K.(2011).ComparativestudyofVANETandMANETroutingprotocols.In
Proceedingsoftheinternationalconferenceonadvancedcomputingandcommunicationtechnologies
(pp. 517–523).
8. Rahim,A.,Ahmad,I.,Khan,Z.S.,Sher,M.,Shoaib,M.,Javed,A.,etal.(2009).Acomparativestudy
of mobileandvehicularadhocnetworks. InternationalJournalofRecentTrendsEngineering,2(4),
195–197.
9. Chen,Y.,Fang,M.,Shi,S.,Guo,W.,&Zheng,X.(2015).Distributedmulti-hopclusteringalgorithm
for VANETsbasedonneighborhoodfollow. EURASIP JournalonWirelessCommunicationsand
Networking, 2015, 98.
10. Hassanabadi,B.,Shea,C.,Zhang,L.,&Valaee,S.(2014).Clusteringinvehicularadhocnetworks
using affinitypropagation. Ad HocNetworks,13, 535–548.
11. Kakkasageri,M.S.,&Manvi,S.S.(2014).Connectivityandmobilityawaredynamicclusteringin
VANETs. International JournalofFutureComputerandCommunication,3(1), 5–8.
12. Lloret,J.,Canovas,A.,&Catala´, A.(2013).Group-basedprotocolandmobilitymodelforVANETsto
offer internetaccess. Journal ofNetworkandComputerApplications,36, 1027–1038.
13. Ucar,S.,Ergen,S.C.,&Ozkasap,O.(2013).VMaSC:Vehicularmulti-hopalgorithmforstableclus-
tering invehicularadhocnetworks.In Proceedings oftheIEEEwirelesscommunicationsandnet-
working conference(WCNC’13) (pp. 2381–2386).
14. Idjmayyel,H.,Qazi,B.R.,&Elmirghani,J.M.H.(2013).Energyefficientdoubleclusterheadrouting
scheme inacityvehicularnetwork.In Proceedingsofthe27thinternationalconferenceonadvanced
information networkingandapplicationsworkshops (pp. 1594–1599).
15. Lo,S.C.,Lin,Y.J.,&Gao,J.S.(2013).Amulti-headclusteringalgorithminvehicularadhoc
networks. InternationalJournalofComputerTheoryandEngineering,5(2), 242–247.
16. Maglaras,L.A.,&Katsaros,D.(2013).Clusteringinurbanenvironments:Virtualforcesappliedto
vehicles. In IEEE internationalconferenceoncommunicationsworkshops(ICC’13) (pp. 484–488).
17. Ghodrati,A.D.(2013).ReducesbroadcaststormusingclusteringinVANETs. InternationalResearch
Journal ofAppliedandBasicSciences,7(13), 979–987.
18. Li,C.,Zhao,C.,Zhu,L.,Lin,H.,&Li,J.(2013).Geographicroutingprotocolforvehicularadhoc
networks incityscenarios:Aproposalandanalysis. International JournalofCommunicationSystems,
4126–4143.
19. Chen,Y.-S.,Hsu,C.-S.,&Cheng,C.-H.(2013).Networkmobilityprotocolforvehicularadhoc
networks. InternationalJournalofCommunicationSystems, 27(11), 3042–3063.
20. Xiaonan,W.,&Huanyan,Q.(2012).ConstructingaVANETbasedonclusterchains. International
Journal ofCommunicationSystems, 2497–2517.
21. Ou,C.-H.(2012).Aroadsideunit-basedlocalizationschemeforvehicularadhocnetworks. International
JournalofCommunicationSystems, 135–150.
22. Daeinabi,A.,Rahbar,A.G.P.,&Khademzadeh,A.(2010).VWCA:Anefficientclusteringalgorithm
in vehicularadhocnetworks. Journal ofNetworkandComputerApplications, 207–222.
23. Yang,Q.,Alvin,L.,Shuang,L.,Jian,F.,&Prathima,A.(2010).ACAR:Adaptiveconnectivityaware
routing forvehicularadhocnetworks. City ScenariosMobileNetworksandApplications,15(1), 36–60.
24. Harrabi,S.,Chainbi,W.,&Ghe´dira, K.(2013).Amulti-agentapproachforroutingonvehicularad-hoc
networks. ANT/SEIT, 19, 578–585.
25. Chen,G.,&Kotz,D.(2000). A surveyofcontext-awaremobilecomputingresearch. TechnicalReport,
Hanover, NH,USA.
26. Kumar,N.,Chilamkurti,N.,&Park,J.H.(2013).ALCA:Agentlearning-basedclusteringalgorithmin
vehicular adhocnetworks. Personal andUbiquitousComputing,17(8), 1683–1692.
27. Saharan,S.,&Kumar,R.(2010).QoSprovisioninginVANETsusingmobileagent. International
Journal ofComputerScience&Communication,1(1), 199–202.
BibTeX
[1]. H. H. Hartenstein and K. P. Laberteaux, A tutorial
survey on vehicular ad hoc networks, IEEE
Communications Magazine, Vol. 46, No. 6, June 2008,
pp. 164-171.
[2]. S. Yousefi, M. Siadat M. Iousavi, and M. Fathy, Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) challenges and perspectives, in Proceedings of the 6th
International Conference on ITS Telecommunications,
2006, pp. 761-766.
[3]. V. Kumar, S. Mishra, N. Chand, Applications of VANETs: Present & Future, Communications and Network, Vol. 5, 2013, pp. 12-15.
[4]. Blum, J. J., Eskandarian, A., and Hoffman, L. J.
Challenges of intervehicle ad hoc networks, IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2004, pp. 347–351.
[5]. P. Ranjan, K. K. Ahirwar, Comparative Study of
VANET and MANET Routing Protocols, in
Proceedings of the International Conference on
Advanced Computing and Communication
Technologies (ACCT’ 11), January 20-22, 2011, pp. 517-523.
[6]. Ch. Sudersan Raju, M. Sailaja, Ch. Balaswamy, Adaptability of MANET Routing Protocols for
VANETS, International Journal of Advanced
Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 2, 7, July 2013, pp. 2823-2829.
[7]. Wex, P. Breuer, J. Held, A. Leinmuller, T. Delgrossi,
L., Trust Issues for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, IEEE, VTC Spring, 2008, pp. 2800-2804.
[8]. Armstrong, L. Dedicated short-range communications
project.
[9]. ASTM E2213-03, Standard Specification for
Telecommunications and Information Exchange
Between Roadside and Vehicle Systems — 5 GHz Band Dedicated Short Range Communications
(DSRC) Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical
Layer (PHY) Specifications, ASTM Int., July 2003.
[10]. IEEE Standard for Wireless LAN Medium Access
Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, Amendment 1: high-speed physical
layer in the 5 GHz band (802.11a), Sep. 1999.
[11]. Uzcategui R, and Acosta-Marum G, Wave: a tutorial,
IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 47, Issue 5,
2009, pp. 126–133.
[12]. 1609.4-2010 – IEEE Standard for Wireless Access in
Vehicular Environments (WAVE)–Multi-channel
operation, 1–89.
[13]. Sebastian Gräfling, Petri Mähönen and Janne
Riihijärvi, Performance evaluation of IEEE 1609 wave and IEEE 802.11p for vehicular communications, in
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), 2010, pp. 344–348.
[14]. D. Dinesh, M. Deshmukh, Challenges in Vehicle Ad
Hoc Network (VANET), International Journal of
Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences, Vol. 2, Issue 7, 2014, pp 76-88.
[15]. A. Paulraj, Code Division Multiple Access for
Cellular Wireless Communications, in Proceedings of
the Conference on Signal Processing and Communication, I. I. Sc., Bangalore, August 1995.
[16]. Theodore S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications:
principles and practice, Prentice Hall PTR, 1996.
[17]. D. Rajaveerappa and M. Sreenivasan, Design and
Development of a Hybrid SDMA/CDMA MAC
BibTeX
Bandi, A. and Chandrashekhar, B.N. (2015) ‘Parameters tuning of OLSR routing protocol with
metaheuristic algorithm for VANET’, International Advance Computing Conference, IEEE.
Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A. and Rimassa, G. (2001) ‘Developing multi-agent systems with a FIPA-
compliant agent framework’, Software-Practice and Experience, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp.103–128.
Bouras, C., Kapoulas, V. and Tsanai, E. (2015) ‘A GPSR enhancement mechanism for routing in
VANETs’, 13th International Conference, WWIC 2015, Malaga, Spain, 25–27 May.
Dorigo, M., Birattari, M. and Stutzle, T. (2006) ‘Ant colony optimization’, IEEE Computational
Intelligence Magazine, No. 4. Ghassan, S. and Tareq, A. (2013) ‘Dynamic safety message power control in VANET using PSO’,
World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal, pp.176–184.
Hajlaoui, R., Guyennet, H. and Moulahi, T. (2016) ‘A survey on heuristic-based routing methods in vehicular ad-hoc network: technical challenges and future trends’, IEEE Sensors Journal,
Vol. 16, No. 17, pp.1–13.
Haklay, M. and Weber, P. (2008) ‘OpenStreetMap: user-generated street maps’, IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 7, pp.12–18.
Harrabi, S., Ben Jaafar, I. and Ghedira, K. (2016) ‘An enhanced AODV routing protocol for
vehicular adhoc networks’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data and Advanced Wireless Technologies, No. 26, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, 10–11 November.
Hartenstein, H.H. and Laberteaux, K.P. (2015) ‘A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks’,
IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp.164–171.
James, G., Cohen, D., Dodier, R., Platt, G. and Palmer, D. (2006) ‘A deployed multiagent
framework for distributed energy applications’, 5th International Joint Conference on
Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Jennings, N.R., Sycara, K. and Wooldridge, M. (1998) ‘A roadmap of agent research and
development’, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp.275–306.
Kaiwartya, O. and Kumar, S. (2014) ‘Geocasting in vehicular adhoc networks using particle swarm
optimization’, ISDOC’14, International Conference on Information Systems and Design of
Communication, ACM, New York, pp.62–66.
Kaiwartya, O., Kumar, S., Lobiyal, D.K., Tiwari, P.K., Abdullah, A.H. and Hassan, A.N. (2015) ‘Multiobjective dynamic vehicle routing problem and time seed based solution using particle
swarm optimization’, Journal of Sensors, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/189832.
Kalambe, K.D., Deshmukh, A.R. and Dorle, S.S. (2015) ‘Particle swarm optimization based
routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc network’, International Journal of Engineering
Research and General Science, Vol. 3, No. 1. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R.C. (1995) ‘Particle swarm optimization’, Proceedings of IEEE
International Conference on Neural Networks, pp.1942–1948.
Krajzewicz, D., Bonert, M. and Wagner, P. (2006) ‘The open source traffic simulation package
SUMO’, RoboCup 2006 Infrastructure Simulation Competition.
Lobiyal, D.K., Katti, C.P. and Giri, A.K. (2014) ‘Parameter value optimization of ad-hoc on demand multipath distance vector routing using particle swarm optimization’, International
Conference on Information and Communication Technologies.…
BibTeX
[1] H.H.HartensteinandK.P.Laberteaux,”Atutorialsurveyonvehicular
ad hocnetworks,”IEEECommunicationsMagazine,vol.46,no.6,June
2008, pp.164-171.
[2] Venkatesh,A.Indra,andR.Murali,”VehicularAdHocNetworks
(Vanets):Issuesandapplications,”JournalofAnalysisandComputation,
vol.8,no.1,(January-June2012),pp.31-45.
[3] P.RanjanandK.-K.Ahirwar,”ComparativeStudyofVANETand
MANET RoutingProtocols,”Proc.oftheInternationalConferenceon
AdvancedComputingandCommunicationTechnologies(ACCT11),
India, 2011,pp.517-523.
[4] P.Salvoa,F.Cuomoa,A.Baiocchia,andI.Rubinb,”Investigating
VANETdisseminationprotocolsperformanceunderhighthroughput
conditions,”VehicularCommunications,vol.2,Issue4,October2015,
pp. 185-194.
[5] A.GorrieriandG.Ferrari,”IrresponsibleAODVrouting,”Vehicular
Communications, vol.2,Issue1,January2015,pp.47-57.
[6] C.Li,C.Zhao,L.Zhu,H.Lin,andJ.Li,”Geographicroutingprotocol
for vehicularadhocnetworksincityscenarios:aproposalandanalysis
”International JournalofCommunicationSystems,vol.27,Issue12,
December 2014,pp.4126-4143.
[7] Y.-S.Chen,Ch.-S.Hsu,andCh.-H.Cheng,”Networkmobilityprotocol
for vehicularadhocnetworks,”InternationalJournalofCommunication
Systems ”,vol.27,Issue11,November2014,pp.3042-3063,doi:
10.1002/dac.2525.
[8] W.XiaonanandQ.Huanyan,”ConstructingaVANETbasedoncluster
chains,”InternationalJournalofCommunicationSystems,vol.27,Issue
11, November2014,pp.2497-2517,doi:10.1002/dac.2484.
[9] S.Harrabi,W.Chainbi,andK.Ghedira,”AMulti-AgentProac-
tiveRoutingProtocolforVehicularAdHocNetworks,”The2014
International SymposiumonNetworks,ComputersandCommuni-
cations (ISNCC14),Hammamet-Tunisia,June2014,pp.1-6,
doi:10.1109/SNCC.2014.6866523...
BibTeX
Saleh Yousefi , Mahmoud Siadat Mousavi, and Mahmood Fathy,” Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs): Challenges and Perspectives” , 6th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications Proceedings, 2006, Pp 761-766.
2. M. Torrent-Moreno, M. Killat, and H. Hartenstein, “The challenges of robust inter-vehicle communications,” in Proceedings of the
IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference – Fall (VTC), vol. 1, 2005, pp. 319– 323.
3. Fan Li and Yu Wang , Routing in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: A Survey , IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, June 2007, pp. 12-
22.
4. Ryu, M. W., Jha, S. H., Koh, J. G., and Cho, K. H., “Position-based routing algorithm improving reliability of inter-vehicle communication, ” Transaction on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS), August 2011.
5. M., and Mahgoub, I., “A Survey of Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks Routing Protocols”, International Journal of Innovation and Applied
Studies, Vol.3, 2013, pp.829-846.
6. Saurabh Chauhan, Shashi Bhushan Tyagi, “Performance Evaluation Of Reactive Routing Protocols In VANET,” International Journal of Innovations and Advancement in Computer Science, Vol. 3, Issue 9, November 2014, pp. 189-193.
7. Naserian, M. Tepe, K.E., “Routing overhead analysis for reactive routing protocols in wireless ad hoc networks,” Wireless And Mobile Computing, Networking And Communications(WiMob’2005), 2005, IEEE International Conference on (Vol.3 ), 22-24 Aug. 2005, pp. 87 – 92, DOI:10.1109/WIMOB.2005.1512889.
8. Rakesh Kumar, Mayank Dave, “ A Comparative Study of Various Routing Protocols in VANET,” IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 8, No. 1, Issue 4, July 2011, Pp. 643-648.
9. Yuyi Luo, Wei Zhang, Yangqing Hu,”A New Cluster Based Routing Protocol for VANET”, IEEE Wireless Communications and Trusted Computing, 2010.…
BibTeX
[1] Kevin,UichinL,GerlaM, »SurveyofRoutingProtocolsIn
VehicularAdHocNetworks »,In:Car2Carcommunication
consortium,2010.
[2] Y.Kim »SecurityIssuesinVehicular
Networks »,pp.468-472,IEEE2013.
[3] E.M.Royer,C-K.Toh, »AReviewofCurrentRouting
Protocols forAd-HocMobileWirelessNetworks,IEEE
Personal CommunicationsMagazine,pp.46-55,1999.
[4] Hong,Xiaoyan,XU,Kaixin,etGERLA,Mario »Scalable
routing protocolsformobileadhocnetworks »,Network,
IEEE, 2002,vol.16,no4,pp.11-21.
[5] C.SivaRammurtyandB.S.Manoj »Adhocwirelessnetworks
architectures andprotocols »ISBN978-81-317-0688-6,2011.
BibTeX
[1] Y. Wang and F. Li, “Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks” in Guide to Wireless Ad HocNetworks, Computer communication and Networks, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84800-328-6_20( 2000).
[2] K. Kutzner, J.-J. Tchouto, M. Bechler, L. Wolf, B. Bochow, and T. Luckenbach, “Connecting Vehicle Scatternets by Internet-Connected Gateways,” Dortmund, Germany (February 2003).
[3] L. Wischhof, A. Ebner, and H. Rohling, “Self-Organizing Traffic Information System based on Car to-Car Communication: Protoype Implementation,” in Proc. 1st Intl. Workshop on Intelligent Transportation, Hamburg, Germany (March 2004).
[4] O. Dousse, P. Thiran, and M. Hasler, “Connectivity in ad-hoc and hybrid networks,” in Proc. Of Infocom (2002).
[5] H. F¨ußler, M. Mauve, H. Hartenstein, D. Vollmer, and M. K¨asemann, “Location based routing for vehicular adhoc networks,” in Proc. MOBICOM ’02, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (September 2002).
[6] N. R.Jennings, K. Sycara, and M. Wooldridge” A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems”, 275–306 (1998).….
BibTeX
[1] M. Wooldridge. Agent-based software engineering. IEE Proc. Software Engineering 1997 ;144 :1; 26–37 .
[2] Kevin,Uichin L, Gerla M. Survey of Routing Protocols.In :Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. In: Car2Car communication consortium,2010. [3] Yu Wang,Fan Li. Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. In: Guide to Wireless Ad HocNetworks, Computer communication and Networks, DOI 2000.
[4] C. Sommer , I. Dietrich. Simulation of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols using OMNeT++ a case study for the DYMO Protocol.Springer Science Business, 2009. [5] Vehicular ad-hoc network, [Online] Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_vehicular_ad-hoc_network.
[6] Vehicular network and its applications, [Online] Available: http://ers.hclblogs.com/2011/03/vehicular-networking- and-its-
applications/.
[7] Zou X, Ramamurthy B, Magliveras S. Routing Techniques in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks – Classification and Comparison. Proceedings of the Sixth World Multi-conference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics, 2002.
BibTeX
https://www.inderscience.com/offers.php?id=118836
BibTeX
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11277-022-09976-5
BibTeX
@inproceedings{harrabi2017reliability, title={Reliability and quality of service of an optimized protocol for routing in VANETs}, author={Harrabi, Samira and Jaffar, Ines Ben and Ghedira, Khaled}, booktitle={CTRQ 2017: The tenth international conference on communication theory, reliability, and quality of service}, year={2017} }